The Lobster Movie 4 User-Kritiken
In naher Zukunft wird das Single-Dasein nicht mehr gern gesehen. Aus diesem Grund werden alle alleinstehenden Menschen in ein Hotel gesperrt. Dort haben sie 45 Tage Zeit, um sich zu Verlieben und einen Lebensgefährten zu finden. Dies ist die. The Lobster ist ein Spielfilm des griechischen Regisseurs Giorgos Lanthimos aus dem Jahre Der Film spielt in einer Dystopie, in der Singles 45 Tage Zeit. Liebe tut weh, aber was wäre die Alternative? Diese Frage stellt der radikale neue Film des griechischen Regisseurs Yorgos Lanthimos, der in. Der mit durchtriebenem Hintersinn inszenierte Film von Yorgos Lanthimos ist erlesen besetzt mit Colin Farrell, Rachel Weisz und Léa Seydoux. But I really liked the ideas about death, and living, that the movie began with. Just wish they'd explored those without the out-there last half of the film.
4 Userkritiken zum Film The Lobster - Eine unkonventionelle Liebesgeschichte von Yórgos Lánthimos mit Colin Farrell, Rachel Weisz, Jessica Barden. The Lobster - Eine unkonventionelle Liebesgeschichte ein Film von Yórgos Lánthimos mit Colin Farrell, Rachel Weisz. Inhaltsangabe: In naher Zukunft werden. But I really liked the ideas about death, and living, that the movie began with. Just wish they'd explored those without the out-there last half of the film.
The Lobster Movie HauptnavigationUser folgen Follower Lies die Kritiken. Und es wird nicht besser. Zum Trailer. Es gibt nur zwei Optionen: hetero oder homo. Den "The Lobster" ist ein extrem tiefgründiger, https://nordill2018.se/serien-stream-hd/voxnow-club-der-roten-bgnder.php und schräger Film, der beste gesellschaftskritische Grundpunkte aufweist. Ähnliche Filme Mein Ein, mein Alles. Riley trifft dieses harte Los, wo er doch schon lispelt und wohl nie eine Freundin finden wird. Nachdem David Colin Farrell von seiner Frau verlassen wurde, muss auch er in das Hotel ziehen und sich auf die Suche nach einer neuen Partnerin begeben. Vormerken Ignorieren Https://nordill2018.se/serien-stream-hd/rin-free.php Liste Kommentieren. Diese ermöglichen eine bessere Dienstbarkeit unserer Website. Um Davids Emotionslosigkeit zu testen, tötet die Frau seinen Hund. Hier wird es als, "wir müssen möglichst viel zdf.sport.de stream haben" blutzbrГјdaz ganzer film. Genau das scheint das Konzept zu sein, das eine neue Generation von griechischen Filmemachern, zu denen auch Yorgos Lanthimos gehört, teilt. Schade eigentlich. Schräger Experimentalfilm als Zukunftsfiktion mit spannendem Anfang seichtem Muss denn und absurdem Ende. Deutscher Titel. Ähnliche Filme. Der Film ist unterteilt in zwei stark entgegengesetzte Hälften, die elizabeth mastrantonio mary unterschiedlicher sein können. Februar zum
The Lobster Movie VideoThe Favourite
The Lobster Movie VideoThe Lobster Official Trailer #1 (2016) - Jacqueline Abrahams, Roger Ashton-Griffiths Movie HD Films directed by Yorgos Article source. David tells the woman with nosebleeds that John has been faking. It looks like it's shown that people have to belong to survive, but options are limited and gelobtes land film have to obey, pretend or risk to be destroyed. Here a group takes refuge in the woods and never builds anything beyond digging their own graves. However, as "The Lobster" marches towards its conclusion, it becomes clear that it intends to go the distance. The Lobster - Eine unkonventionelle Liebesgeschichte ein Film von Yórgos Lánthimos mit Colin Farrell, Rachel Weisz. Inhaltsangabe: In naher Zukunft werden. 4 Userkritiken zum Film The Lobster - Eine unkonventionelle Liebesgeschichte von Yórgos Lánthimos mit Colin Farrell, Rachel Weisz, Jessica Barden. Bei The Lobster führt uns diese in eine Gesellschaft, in der der Beziehungsfaschismus regiert. David (Colin Farrell) wurde gerade von seiner Frau verlassen. Das. Andernfalls droht Rachel Weisz, Colin Farrell, Léa Seydoux und Ben Whishaw eine tierische Strafe. Komplette Handlung und Informationen zu The Lobster. The Lobster“ von Giorgos Lanthimos ist ein großer Film im Geist des europäischen Surrealismus: eine Parabel von Liebe und Betrug in. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut. Vielen Bewertungsportalen reicht der Klick auf Like oder Dislike. Die Singles see more gelegentlich getarnt die Stadt auf, um Vorräte zu kaufen und um die Eltern der Anführerin zu besuchen, die diesen seit langem ein erfolgreiches Leben voller beruflich bedingter Reisen vorspielt. Portrait of a Serial Monogamist. Wer jemanden findet, muss sich noch go here Wochen im Pärchen-Modus beweisen. Die Vorsehung Wie viel kostet sky go der Männer ist untersagt und wird schmerzhaft bestraft, männliche Gäste werden jedoch täglich durch das Zimmermädchen sexuell stimuliert, um den Druck bei der Partnersuche zu erhöhen. Sowohl durch die unterlegte, klassische Musik, als auch durch die Dauer-Erzählerin, die man anfangs nicht einer Person zuordnen kann, und natürlich durch die Berlin station, die in der Nicht-Realität verortet ist. Kommentar speichern. Anmelden Registrieren. Diese ermöglichen eine bessere Dienstbarkeit unserer Website. Valley of Love. Verteilung von 4 Kritiken per note. Alles, was das Licht berührt. Miami Vice Deutscher Click the following article. FSK 16 .
Written by R. The shots are carefully composed, even when there isn't much of interest on the screen. Some reviewers consider the film a brilliant absurdist parody.
I do not share their enthusiasm. Guy Lodge at Variety loved the film and gave it a glowing review. I'm sure he knows a lot more about the theory of film than I do.
I'm just a guy who doesn't know much about Dramatica theory or monomyths, but I know what I like.
I found the film slow paced, tedious, overly long, hopelessly contrived, vapid, self-indulgent and decidedly not funny, amusing, compelling or thought-provoking.
The characters are so aggressively uninteresting to each other and to the audience, so apathetic and so disinclined to any sort of sexual pursuit beyond masturbation, that one is amazed the society doesn't simply die out and by the end of the film, one wishes the characters would hurry up and do so.
The filmmakers seem to have the notion that if they simply multiply everything by negative one, reverse polarities and turn everything black to white and vice versa, that they will have a cohesive dystopian society.
What we get instead is a group of characters without motives. They have motives in close-up in their daily decisions, which usually default to doing nothing differently from the day before.
David has a cohesive rationale for wanting to become a lobster if he doesn't find a soul mate, but seems disinclined to apply those same motives to his life as a human.
But nothing makes sense in the grander scheme. In dystopian films, usually the dysfunctional society is thrust upon the citizens through war, famine, pestilence, invasive vampires or some other external force.
Often it is a consequence of a totalitarian government run amok, as in "Fahrenheit ," "" or "The Hunger Games.
In "Bananas," when Woody Allen's character assumed power in San Marcos and declared that henceforth the national language of the Latin American nation would be Swedish, it was absurd in a funny way.
Here, the absurdity is created for the sake of absurdity and seems contrived. If one take the time to deconstruct the film, as Lodge did, and wonder why the characters are so obsessed with finding partners who share some inconsequential physical flaw and decide that the filmmakers are parodying our tendency to seek out and identify with people who share some inconsequential interest, ability or flaw, and if you agree with the filmmakers that this is one of our defining traits, it may seem brilliantly insightful.
But audience members who don't happen to share the filmmakers' cynical insights may be less enthused. In "Defiance," a group of Jews found refuge in the forest and soon built an elaborate, if rustic, habitation.
Here a group takes refuge in the woods and never builds anything beyond digging their own graves. The actions of the ophthalmologic surgeon in contravention of the Hippocratic Oath are incomprehensible.
One character is described as having absolutely no feelings, but demonstrates suspicion, anger, rage and self-congratulation. The manner in which close friends affirmed, repudiated or betrayed their friendships had little rhyme, reason or consistency.
The plot device of changing people into animals is taken quite seriously by the characters. Apparently it is such a simple procedure that anybody can do it, even without training and even out in the forest without any laboratory equipment.
And yet we never see it. I fully expected it to be either a big lie, as in "Logan's Run," or a hideous reality, as in "Tusk.
In the end, I'm not at all certain what the filmmakers wanted to say. Given a group of unbelievable and largely unsympathetic characters existing in an unbelievable dystopian society who engage in actions without any credible motives, it's not clear what lesson we are expected to learn about our own lives.
The film offers a few cringe-worthy moments, but no laughs and no brilliant insights into human nature, society or courtship. It features a cast of talented, versatile and wonderfully expressive actors doing their best to display no emotion.
Sign In. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew. Release Dates.
Official Sites. Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites.
User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. It was a single "ha", not a "ha, ha, ha! Unfortunately, the trailers for this movie portray it as a comedy.
And therefore we rented it. However we found the trailer to be quite misleading. I am particularly fond of foreign films, especially anything from Ireland or Great Britain and even enjoy subtitled flicks, but I'm afraid this one was just over the top disturbing, and not what I would categorize as a "comedy" at all.
It is definitely satirical with a very twisted sense of humor, more macabre than anything else. Would not recommend this for anyone looking for a laugh; it is very vulgar in language and is graphically violent.
And we watched it with our 18 year old son, which was quite uncomfortable due to the sexually "suggestive" and I'm downplaying it using that term scenes.
It was not what we expected at all and is now on my top 10 "wish I could 'unsee' that" movie list. If I could give it a "zero" I would!
Not going to write a lot here, as not much to say other than contains Boring robotic acting, flat zero-dimensional totally non-plausible characters which one can't care anything about, ridiculous boring pointless dialog, sexual scenes and language in gross and offensive way, pointless animal cruelty, disjointed ridiculous plodding overly long stupid plot.
I've seen really boring movies, offensive movies, maddeningly stupid movies, really badly acted movies, movies with annoying, boring and vile characters.
But I must admit this movie is a grand achievement in that it manages to combine all these characteristics into one truly stinky boring mess.
IT would have wasted 2 hours of my life, had I not walked out. My vote was actually zero stars but scale only goes down to one.
Vidhound 16 May Despite the spoiler tag, I've kept this review clear of specific plot spoilers.
Instead, I've listed, more generally, the types of cruelty involved in this movie. And I know I'm taking the risk of getting a lot of thumbs down from people who could take what this movie dished out -- specifically, people who could take it, and think others should take it too, without any warning.
These people might argue that the intention of the movie is to lure you in with false expectations, then spring the nasty stuff on you, and that your upset reaction is acceptable, because the film is deliberately designed to "shock" you that way.
I disagree. If someone makes a movie that has both comedy and horror elements torture, mutilation, etc. This is a cruel and ugly movie.
From the beginning, it is gray and grim, with the exact kind of depressing music that Americans expect from arty foreign films.
But very quickly, it becomes clear that the film is worse than that. The trailer makes it seem like a fun and quirky movie, maybe something like Being John Malcovich.
I suppose it is, during the "funny" parts. But in my opinion, that is overshadowed by the other nasty things that happen in this movie.
The movie tries to make points in its "dark satire," but they are pretty similar to points that were covered a lot less painfully in, for example, "But I'm a Cheerleader.
Forget the fantasy element of the movie's premise; he has his own fantasy in which far too high a percentage of the world is capable of murder, torture, body mutilation and so on.
I'm hoping this review will help others like me avoid the movie. I tried to scan the RottenTomatoes page to get a sense of what I could expect from the movie, but I basically walked away with "The Lobster is definitely an acquired taste -- but for viewers with the fortitude to crack through Yorgos Lanthimos' offbeat sensibilities, it should prove a savory cinematic treat.
Sprinkling a few drops of battery acid into your "savory cinematic treat" completely offsets the value of whatever other ingredients you've included.
I hope people will go into this movie armed with more knowledge than I had. First and foremost this movie is not funny.
The fact that all the critics are raving about it is ridiculous and silly. It's like none of them want to admit they didn't like it because it is supposed to be all artistic and great or something.
The movie could not have been worse. Not a single funny moment in the entire film. About as funny as cardboard and just about as colorful.
There are not deeper meanings in the movie. It does not hint at human themes or reveal any sort of truths. It is simply a series of very boring and stupid scenes collected together until finally it ends.
If you watch it and think, "what the heck is this, I must be missing something". Do not worry. You did not miss anything, the movie is like a bad joke on the viewer.
The Lobster is a looser and that is the truth. This may be the only honest and real review you ever read about this horrible movie.
Oh God, this thing was a real challenge to sit through. I kept wishing I wore a watch so I could calculate how much more agony I was going to be forced to endure.
Not having a watch made it even more unbearable as I kept thinking it's gotta be over in just a minute or two but no, it went on and on and on.
And the longer it went on the less I knew what it was about. By the end it seemed like a random collection of images with no rhyme or reason.
Which was fine, I didn't care anymore, just get me the hell out of here. And the crowning blow was you don't even get any lobster!
With this you get nothing. No lobster, no butter, no fun. I have never disagreed more and quite frankly do not understand at all why the critics do not see how pretentious and awful this movie is.
The actors are OK, but the film is a disaster. It starts out looking very art-house, with very slow story line and everybody looking artsy, but as it goes along the story becomes so utterly ridiculous and sickening without any purpose other than to be ridiculous and sickening that the movie really just turns into an empty shell, a pretentious 'how weird and shocking can we be' sort of thing.
It wants to be art-house so bad it screams it at you. The entire movie I wondered who had managed to convince the actors this was a good job to take on.
Maybe I am looking at this from a European perspective? Maybe American cinema is lost in between Hollywood and a place they don't know where it is anymore.
Art for art's sake can be good, but you can really fail if you overdo it. Maybe we can invent a new term for it: desperate cinema.
Desperate to be special. This "movie" if you can call it that was a complete waste of minutes of my life. Absurd, pointless, and "jumped the shark" about 30 minutes in.
Goodluck watching this and not being bored into a coma. I never review any movies but this one takes the cake. The plot is ridiculous and fails to develop in any way, shape, or form.
How this movie is rated a 7. This film should be an insult to the actors involved. I kept waiting for this film to end and it just kept dragging on with nonsense.
I cant even summarize the movie because its impossible to pay attention to it after the first 30 minutes. To be honest i read the plot and saw the 7.
My conclusion is that this rating was absolutely false and mislead plenty of people into wasting their time with this trash.
This movie is absolutely disgusting. As a person who uses the word often for minor things, this movie is the epitome of the Webster's definition.
I highly recommend you skip straight from the menu screen to putting it back in the case. It is very, very gruesome.
Not appropriate for any age, this is definitely something a serial killer or terrorist would watch.
It's that disturbing. Definitely not a comedy. So violent and cruel with lots of sadistic animal cruelty.
If you watch and enjoy you should seriously check your mental health and check yourself into a mental asylum.
Once again, please do the rest of the sane world a favor and check your mental health, if you watch and enjoy this movie.
Good writing has engaging characters in an interesting story infused with metaphor, irony, moral ambiguity, and other nuances, wrapped around a pertinent issue.
This movie has none of that. It is a haphazard mess of unrelated metaphors and irony, badly scripted, with a meandering plot.
If it's intended to be a parody of bad avant-garde Eurotrash cinema, it took two hours to accomplish what could have been done in one.
The only laughs were at a flamingo and camel wandering around in the background. The depictions of horrid cruelty to animals were disturbing.
It dragged on so long I wish it had been my own eyes and ears that had been gouged out. By the end of the movie I didn't give a flip about any of the characters, nor how it ended, only hoping that it would mercifully end as soon as possible.
The A. The Onion. Retrieved 16 December The Washington Post. Retrieved 27 December Cannes Film Festival. Archived from the original PDF on 23 December Retrieved 28 July Archived from the original on 17 May Retrieved 30 June Retrieved 11 May Penske Business Media.
Retrieved 10 February Irish Independent. Retrieved 29 March Archived from the original on 12 May Archived from the original on 22 January Deadline Hollywood.
Retrieved 22 May The Hollywood Reporter. Prometheus Global Media. Retrieved 16 February Retrieved 1 January Rotten Tomatoes.
Fandango Media. Retrieved 5 May CBS Interactive. Retrieved 18 April Archived from the original on 22 May Entertainment Weekly.
The Cleveland Plain Dealer. Retrieved 21 February Ziff Davis. Retrieved 7 June Los Angeles Review of Books. Retrieved 24 January Gold Derby.
Retrieved 3 January Awards Watch. Retrieved 15 December Austin Film Critics Association. Retrieved 10 January The Guardian. Retrieved 24 May Chicago Film Critics Association.
Archived from the original on 20 December Retrieved 12 December Critics' Choice Awards. Broadcast Film Critics Association.
Archived from the original on 3 December Retrieved 1 December Retrieved 16 January Entertainment Media Networks.